Up to $2.5 billion in State Payments to Public Schools Delayed
Over the objections of public schools, the Assembly narrowly passed a bill February 25 that would allow the state to postpone up to $2.5 billion in payments to kindergarten through Grade 12 districts between July 2010 and March 2011.
Public schools, which have shouldered $14 billion of the $35 billion in spending reductions approved by lawmakers and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger over the past two years, already have $5 billion in state payments to them deferred — $2 billion due in February but paid in July, $1.7 billion due in April and May pushed to August and $1.4 billion payable in June pushed to July.
Local districts worry that if cash from the state comes late, they could default on short-term loans they use to smooth out the ups-and-downs of their cash flow.
“Schools are already cash-starved,” Mike Ricketts, a lobbyist for the California County Superintendents Educational Services Association, told a special Assembly committee debating the bill, ABX8 5. “Under existing deferrals that aren’t subject of this bill $2 billion that grows to $5 billion that is not paid the schools by June.”
Under the bill, which squeaked out of the Assembly on a bare two-thirds 54 to 14 vote, up to three payment deferrals to schools can be made in the fiscal year that begins July 1. If the state has adequate cash flow, no deferrals would occur.
If deferrals do occur, no more than $2.5 billion can be outstanding at one time.
Payments due schools in July, October and March 2011 could be postponed 60, 90 and 60 days, respectively.
Dennis Meyers, a lobbyist for the California Association of School Business Officials, asked that the deferral window be limited to 30 days to make it easier for districts to plan their cash flow needs.
“We need clarity and definitive timelines and dates,” Meyers testified. “It would be very helpful to know the specific amount of money.”
The bill, which the GOP governor is expected to sign, also defers payments to cities and counties as well as some state agencies to improve the state’s cash flow and allow it to pay bills instead of issue IOUs as it was forced to do last year.
Payments to counties and cities with populations of 50,000 or less would be exempted from payments delays. So would small vendors.
Fifteen of California’s 58 counties have populations under 50,000 including Calaveras, Lassen, Mono, Plumas, Siskiyou and Trinity.
Included on the list for payment deferral is the University of California, California State University and community colleges, which will have $300 million in payments postponed under the bill.
“We’re already wrestling with $1 billion in deferrals. That’s 17 percent of our funding,” said Eric Skinner, a lobbyist for the state’s 110-campus community college system. “This delay, which could be as long as a month, would put 25 of our community colleges at risk of defaulting on their (borrowing) agreements.”
Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, a Santa Rosa Democrat who chairs the lower house’s budget committee, told educators the problems would be resolved in subsequent legislation before passing the deferral bill out of her committee to the Assembly floor.
-30-
Filed under: Budget and Economy
- Capitol Cliches (16)
- Conversational Currency (3)
- Great Moments in Capitol History (4)
- News (1,288)
- Budget and Economy (383)
- California History (139)
- Demographics (11)
- Fundraising (74)
- Governor (122)
- Legislature/Legislation (270)
- Politics (173)
- State Agencies (38)
- Opinionation (36)
- Overheard (246)
- Today's Latin Lesson (45)
- Restaurant Raconteur (21)
- Spotlight (110)
- Trip to Tokyo (8)
- Venting (184)
- Warren Buffett (43)
- Welcome (1)
- Words That Aren't Heard in Committee Enough (11)
This is one more reason for sane people to flee Education. Our kids will be left with the lunatic fringe for teachers. This fringe being the homesteading tea baggers who want to turn teaching into a vountary profession. These lunatics, and they are lunatics, think that teaching should be some sort of priesthood where devotion to students means economic sacrifice so dire that raising a middle class family is impossible. I do not understand the logic – because there is none.
How can there be a ‘spending problem’ when Education statewide is being funded at 2006 levels and the costs of every supply has risen? I admit to being fringish myself, in that I believe that teachers should maintain a livable wage for working their tails off.
This vote is further proof that the Democrat majority lacks the gonads to stand up for itself without being cajoled by unions fighting for workers. It is a truly sad state of affairs. Finding your bliss does not entail getting screwed, so you can sign me: Well Educated, Actively Seeking Employment.
Comment by Hammer — 2.26.2010 @ 6:49 pm