crack adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 for Mac buy cheap freeware like adobe photoshop adobe photoshops primary scratch Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium for Mac buy cheap adobe illustrator download full version adobe photoshop help learning Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended for Mac buy cheap adobe photoshop 2.0 tutorial adobe photoshop elements Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium for Mac buy cheap adobe flash professional cs3 getting student discount adobe creative suite Adobe Creative Suite Master Collection for Mac buy cheap adobe photoshop extended online help examples free cracked adobe photoshop cs2 Adobe Illustrator CS5 buy cheap academic pricing adobe photoshop adobe photoshop cs3 windows vista Adobe Flash Professional CS5 buy cheap adobe illustrator 10 downloads adobe photoshop 7.0 serial number generator Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 buy cheap adobe illustrator cs3 trail patch adobe creative suite 3 master Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended buy cheap adobe photoshop cs3 extended activation unsuccesful adobe illustrator cs tips and tricks Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium buy cheap adobe photoshop buttons to buy adobe photoshop tutorials brushes free Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection buy cheap indesign adobe creative suite

Archive for October, 2009

Dim Sum Slutiness Is as Dim Sum Sluttiness Does

Being insatiable seems an essential element of sluttiness.

A slut can’t be sated or else they wouldn’t be a slut, right?

Being insatiable also bespeaks a certain lack of discrimination. Therefore, as a dim sum slut, if a new venue is discovered it must be experienced. Previously in this space, during the then known Sacramento dim sum universe, New Canton on Broadway was celebrated as the most divine.

Memo to New Canton: Feel the breath of Happy Garden Seafood Restaurant on your neck.

Immortalized in 2007 by the Sacramento News & Review as the best place in town for an Asian wedding, the monstrous restaurant at 5731 Stockton with its two downstairs and one upstairs dining rooms and its oasis of palm tree and bamboo in one distant corner could host three weddings simultaneously within its vastness.

The space seems even bigger on weekdays when the lunch crowd is anything but and only a couple dim sum carts ply the aisles. Weekends, however, it can be bedlam-and-a-half.

Happy Garden is big on bigness. The dim sum menu itself boasts close to 60 items. For the edification of diners, photos of the selections are exhibited on a large table near the front door. A small dish is $2.25, a medium one is $2.75 and the large are $3.25.

All are circulated by cart on weekends and many are available by request on weekdays when the carts tend to feature the stalwarts: char sui bau, har gow, siu mai, shark fin gow and the bowl o’ bones spareribs, offered here with the nice flourish of several jalapeno circles. The bones are the first dish ordered at Happy Garden. Like Jerry Maguire: Had me from hello.

When going the weekday special request route, direct the requests to Fiona (Duong, according to a Sacramento County food inspection report), formerly of Vietnam but of Chinese descent. She recounts a spectacularly hilarious “Who’s on First?” phone exchange with someone infinitely less conversant in English who wants to speak to the owner which is what the person hears whenever Fiona replies, “No, I’m Fiona.”

She sees me slop some soy on the table and use my napkin to wipe it up. Without prompting, she delivers a stack of napkins. As a joke, she lays a stack on me at my next visit. The third visit, she recalls my penchant for yellow mustard, bringing it and plenty of napkins without being asked.

Even the dim sum is over-sized at Happy Garden. Fiona says this is because Sacramento is a cow town and everything in cow towns is big. The siu mai are on steroids. The shrimp and chives dumpling is at least one-half size bigger than other dim sum places. The har gow is hefty, too. And they’re fighters. None of the har gow wants to release from the paper at the bottom of the steaming basket, causing only the stuffing of two to be eaten. 

Worried my sluttiness causes me to believe the siu mai tastes superior to all others, experts are sought. While dim sum devotees, Craig Brown and Geoff Long do not qualify as dumpling sluts. They make rational and measured assessments.  We speak of the California Environmental Quality Act, its use and abuse. Proof, as though any were needed, that we really know how to live.

 For Craig and Geoff, the scallop gow is a newly discovered hit. Of the siu mai, they gush that it’s the best they’ve ever eaten. An additional quartet is quickly ordered. A new experience for all of us is sampling what is described by the cart-pusher as “tofu skin with shrimp inside.” It is judged “good.”

Of the Cantonese sausage roll, which is a pineapple-ish tasting, breakfasty sausage in an oval char siu bao bun, Geoff sniffs, “I came to eat dim sum not pigs-in-a-blanket.”

Craig and I are not so prickly; pigs-in-baos scores high. The Shanghai pork buns, one of the $3.25 dishes, are, not surprisingly, large but, surprisingly, not accompanied by the traditional ginger dipping sauce.

 Dim sum happens at Happy Garden. Every day.

-30-

Billion Here, Billion There — Pretty Soon, Real Money

Both of the recently introduced $9.4 billion general obligations bonds to fund a variety of water-related projects would spend $1.5 billion on dirt.

In his bond proposal, SB3 7X, Senate President Pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg, a Sacramento Democrat, calls its “Statewide Watershed and Water Quality Protections.

In the bond introduced by Sen. Dave Cogdill, a Fresno Republican, it is called “Conservation and Watershed Protection.”

But it’s dirt nonetheless.

Watershed is defined as  “the entire geographical area drained by a river and its tributaries; an area characterized by all runoff being conveyed to the same outlet.”

That would be dirt.

And the bond measures are fairly specific about what dirt they want protected.

Section 79750 of Cogdill’s measure, SB2 7X, is Section 79760 of Steinberg’s bill in that both begin by saying the $1.5 billion will be spent on “grants for ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects including but not limited to, all of the following watersheds:

(a) The San Joaquin River watershed.

 (b) The Kern River and Tulare Basin watersheds.

 (c) The Salton Sea and Colorado River watersheds.

 (d) The Los Angeles River watershed.

 (e) The San Gabriel River watershed.

 (f) The Santa Ana River watershed.

 (g) The Klamath River watershed, including the Trinity, Scott, and Shasta Rivers and watersheds.

 (h) The North Coast watersheds.

 (i) The San Francisco Bay watersheds.

 (j) The Central Coast watersheds.

 (k) The South Coast watersheds.

 (l) The Lake Tahoe Basin watershed.

 (m) The Sacramento River watershed, including the Yolo Bypass.

 (n) The San Diego County coastal watersheds.

 (o) The Ventura River watershed.

 (p) The Sierra Nevada Mountain watersheds.

 (q) The Mojave River watershed.

 (r) The Owens River watershed.

 (s) The Santa Monica Bay watershed.

 (t) The watersheds of Marin County.

 (u) The watersheds of Orange County.

That’s a lot of dirt.

The following three to four pages of each bill – Cogdill’s runs 21 8.5” x 11” pages, Steinberg’s 17 – detail even more minutely where the $1.5 billion is going, should lawmakers pass one of the measures and voters approve it in November 2010.

In Cogdill’s bill, $65 million would be given to the Department of Fish and Game for “expenditures and grants to protect the Delta ecosystem and the state’s water supply from invasive species, including, but not limited to, asiatic clams, zebra

mussels, quagga mussels, and New Zealand mud snails.”

(Editor’s Note: Dare one say, the dreaded New Zealand mud snails. And, in this enlightened era, why single out the Asiatic clams?)

Cogdill would also give “at least” – that’s what the bill says — $35 million in taxpayer money to “public agencies, including water agencies, to pay for capital expenditures associated with the control of invasive species, including, but not limited to, chlorination facilities, habitat modifications, and monitoring equipment.”

Those would be water agencies with the ability to raise revenue by increasing the fees of their users.

Section 79755 of Cogdill’s bill bestows $200 million on the State Coastal Conservancy. Steinberg hands them $250 million in his Section 79764.

Cogdill would give $100 million to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection – a major presence in his rural district – for “fuel treatment and forest restoration projects to protect watersheds tributary to dams or reservoirs from the adverse impacts of fire and erosion, to promote forest health in those watersheds, to protect life and property, to provide for climate change adaptation and reduce total wildfire costs and losses.”

There’s a lengthy report by the U.S. Forest Service on the Angora fire that occurred in Lake Tahoe in 2007. The phrase “fuel treatment” is used routinely but never defined.

Fuel treatment means cutting down small trees and brush that allow flames to leap from the ground into the forest canopy.

Would the casual reader be stunned that no such allocation exists in Steinberg’s bill?

Steinberg gives $100 million to the Wildlife Conservation Board to buy water rights from anyone who wants to sell them. Cogdill, a paltry $20 million.

But both agree – Cogdill in Section 79757 and Steinberg in Section 79768 that only $250 million be spent on dam removal on the Klamath River. Dam removal is a key feature of the recent deal inked regarding the river’s future.

There are conditions, though:

  “(a) The State of California, the State of Oregon, the United States, and PacifiCorp have executed a dam removal                      agreement.

   (b) The State of California, the State of Oregon, and the United States have made the determinations required under the             agreement to effect dam removal.

   (c) Ratepayer funds required by the agreement have been authorized and will be timely provided.

   (d) All other conditions required in the agreement have been met.”

Thank God. Wouldn’t want to just throw taxpayer money away, would we?

-30-

Confessions of a Women’s Conference Escort 2009

Agnes Stevens, founder of School on Wheels was honored with a Minerva Award at the newly re-titled Governor and First Lady’s Conference on Women and Families.

The award is given to women who exemplify the courage and wisdom of the Roman goddess whose likeness appears on California’s state seal.

“Warriors on the frontline of humanity,” First Lady Maria Shriver said at the conference of the four Minerva award winners.

“They all show a willingness to act on the compassion they feel towards others and I know of no greater gift to our world than that,” Shriver said.

Each Minerva winner is assigned an escort, a volunteer who helps ensure their experience at the two-day conference is stress and mistake-free.

Two minutes with Agnes – let alone two days – is a delight and easy proof her 20 years educating homeless children is deserving of not only a Minerva but the World’s Children’s Prize for the Rights of the Child, the children’s “Nobel Prize,” which she received in 2008.

Generous and genuine, Agnes with her short curly, gray hair, which she says she cuts when it gets too long to wash and let dry on its own, started School on Wheels after she read a book on homelessness as friend gave her.

Appalled by the number of homeless and the educational obstacles of homeless children, she ended her retirement from teaching and began to tutor homeless kids. Now, nearly 1,000 volunteers throughout Southern California mentor homeless kids through Agnes’ organization.

One woman helped by the organization is a freshman at UCLA. Another is a student at Harvard.

During the two days of the conference, Agnes speaks passionately in conversation about the dearth of public school funding, the closing of domestic violence centers and the failure of politicians to adequately address the needs of the homeless, particularly children.

She raises her hand when Sir Richard Branson, founder of The Virgin Group of companies, asks the audience who favors a mandate that 50 percent of the membership of all or prorate boards be women.  Agnes is in the minority.

Her craggy face can lock in determination but a joke or funny comment unleashes a broad, infectious grin – and usually a snappy rejoinder. She also has a mischievous sense of humor.

School on Wheels Executive Director Catherine Meek accompanied Agnes to the conference. However, she didn’t have the same all-access passes Agnes and her escort did. That meant Catherine was routinely stopped and told she couldn’t enter places Agnes could.

“They’ve been suspicious of you from the start,” Agnes says to her.

“As well they should,” Catherine retorts.

Agnes, 74, routinely walks Skid Row looking for homeless kids. “They don’t come to you,” she says. School on Wheels has a center there where homeless families drop off their kids, knowing they’ll be safe. Agnes says the only thing that scares her is dogs.

“They can smell when you’re afraid,” she says.

Chit-chatting about the level of congestion on Los Angeles freeways, Agnes says she only drives surface streets, commuting from her mobile home at Paradise Cove in Malibu, a long drive to School on Wheels’ Skid Row center. She laughs when asked if Jim Rockford is her neighbor.

Agnes and Catherine have given away their tickets to various seminars at the conference to School on Wheels staff. Agnes says. Somewhat sheepishly, she says she would like to attend a panel featuring US Airways Captain Chesley Sullenberger, who successfully landed his plane in the Hudson River and helped save all passengers and crew.

Agnes considers him a hero and like his self-effacing behavior after the incident.

Tickets aren’t in abundance. But Tamara Torlakson, one of the women who helped organize the conference, come sup with two. Catherine and Agnes are grateful.

This sort of karma clings to Agnes throughout the conference. Watching Caroline Kennedy on television as she kicks off the Minerva award ceremony. Agnes says she wishes she could meet her.  Because she is the first Minerva to be honored, Agnes is sitting on a chair backstage as Kennedy walks off and gets to shake her hand.

Catherine says that Agnes, a former nun, wears only sweat suits and tennis shoes and so, prior to the conference, Catherine takes her to a department store to buy an outfit more suitable for an award ceremony in front of 25,000 people.

“I don’t know what to do,” Agnes says when they enter the store.

Catherine – the first Skid Row volunteer, Agnes says – is a force herself. From Glasgow, the two-time cancer survivor helped professionalize School on Wheels, creating a handbook for the organization’s 16 employees.

“I couldn’t imagine we’d ever have an employee handbook, Agnes says. “I thought that would be the end,” she jokes.

During the two days of the conference three of the four Minerva winners are together at an October 26 reception thanking the event’s sponsors and sit at a table in the Long Beach Arena listening to presentations and panel discussions.

Dr. Jane Goodall, the fourth recipient, is busy with a flurry of book signings and meetings with the press.

Agnes laugh as Geena Davis tells the audience that at the rate we’re adding women to Congress there should be parity between the sexes in 500 years.

“I say that’s too long, Davis deadpans. “I say we cut that in half – 250 years is plenty of time.”

Also at the table is Dr. Kathy Hull, another recipient. She is the co-founder of George Mark House, the nation’s first stand-alone, residential pediatric hospice. She is accompanied by her husband.

Helen Devore Waukazoo, co-founder of the American Indian Friendship House in San Francisco   spends the morning of October 27 at the conference but decides to rest at her hotel before the awards ceremony allowing her escort, 2007 Minerva winner Commander Maureen Pennington to shop in the large exhibit hall next to the arena, the first time she’s been able to do so at one of the conferences.

Agnes and Catherine stay for the afternoon program which features Katie Couric, Shriver and a panel on grieving with Elizabeth Edwards and Susan St. James, both of whom lost teenage sons in accidents as well as Patrick Swayze’s wife, Lisa Niemi. Shriver recounts the effect on her of the loss of her “mummy” and “Uncle Teddy.” Couric, the death of 42-year-old husband of colo-rectal cancer. Catherine is teary eyed.

The first time all four recipients are together is the holding room prior to the awards ceremony. Agnes shakes Goodall’s hand and tells her she is great.

Goodall, who said she was cold all day, tells Agnes: “You’re great too.

Agnes removes her black tennis shows and replaces them with black patent flats for the ceremony. She sips a little lemonade.

Goodall writes talking points in cramped writing on tan, enveloped-sized sheets of what appears to be recycled paper. Hull tinkers with her thank you speech. Like Agnes, Waukazoo waits quietly.

At the walk-through of the ceremony, Agnes is asked if she wants to make any changes to the text she supplied in advance on the teleprompter. Agnes makes a few changes, joking that it will help generate more contributions. On the way back, to the holding room, she remarks on what a nice woman the technician is.

She is equally generous with the man who does her face in the black Georgio Armani tent where speakers and Minerva winners can a free make-up job. When the make-up artist is finished, Agnes shakes his hand.

After a video highlighting her work, a smiling Agnes came on stage, waving at the crowd with both hands.

In her speech, she called on people to do something in their communities until there were no more homeless children living in streets or in cars.  She said she was “honored and humbled to be in the company of so many wonderful women who have received this award.”

Of homeless children, she said:

 “I am constantly amazed by the courage of these children who find the strength within themselves to study and learn every day, no matter how many times they move or how many schools they attend. In honoring me, you honor the homeless children.

Agnes was walking off the stage when Shriver the award came with $25,000.

“She’s walking away,” Shriver said. “Don’t walk away when I’m giving you the big money.”

Goodall, the final recipient to be honored twice referenced Agnes’ work and that of the other two recipients as important.

After the ceremony during the rounds of photographs of the winners, Agnes and Goodall struck up a conversation, one of the central aspects of the conference — the bringing together disparate women seeking a common purpose.

The day following the conference in an e-mailed thank you to her escort, Agnes said this:

“This whole experience was amazing – all the wonderful speakers, all the wonderful women attending and the three Minerva Winners I met. To be honored with them was truly “cool”.  Their stories and they themselves meant much to me and I learned much from them.”

 

Agnes in the Green Room

Agnes in the Green Room

(Editor’s Note: Photos by Tracey Fuller, Dr. Hull’s escort. Watch the Minerva Awards presentation here. Click the Button below the “Our Webcast” section. Agnes starts just after minute 23. More information on School on Wheels is here.)

100_1783

-30-

Guest Post: Two (Senate) Officers and a Gentleman

By Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Tony Beard and Greg Schmidt, Secretary of the Senate.

The day started with the usual grey West Coast beach overcast which, as the bagpiper played, soon began to break. The morning sunlight gradually crept through the stained glass windows, filling the sanctuary of the American Martyrs Catholic Church with a sense of warmth and welcome.

The people who had come this day to celebrate the life of long-time senator Robert Graham Beverly numbered about 250, including former California senator and Governor George Deukmejian, Former Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, Attorney General and former Governor Jerry Brown, Secretary of State Debra Bowen, Assemblyman Charles Calderon and former legislators Richard Alatorre, Mike Roos, and Jerry Felando. 

There was also a special friend and emissary — Don Maddy, the son of Beverly’s closest friend, the late Senator Ken Maddy — and numerous friends, professional associates and neighbors.

Beverly’s wife of 64 years, Bettilu, along with her family, greeted us as we entered the church.  Once seated, we were greeted by a large black and white photograph of Beverly as a candidate, very Kennedy-like, coatless with shirt and tie, sitting on the top of the back seat of a white convertible, white hair, a broad smile, waving to the crowd in front of him.  On this day that crowd was us.  It was hard not to wave back.  It made you smile, just remembering.

After the Catholic ceremony, we were treated to various remembrances of this man — father, grandfather, husband, Ssenator. 

Superior Court Judge Hollingsworth, a former law partner, remembered their struggles in the early days.  How they spent time pitching pennies with each other in the office waiting for the phone to ring. How their careers as lawyers grew, right up to Judge Hollingsworth’s appointment to the Superior Court bench where later in his career he was asked to serve in the South Bay Superior Court, so it would be easier for him to have his weekly Friday lunch with his pal, Bob Beverly. 

It was evident that change of location was “influenced quietly by the Senator”.

Judge Bill Keene, who said, “his credentials were in order to recall his 60-year friend.” said that Bob, “sang from inside” as a state senator.  How he was meant to fill that seat.  How the judge’s favorite Yiddish word was “mensch” .  How it meant someone of consequence, someone to be emulated and admired, someone of noble character, with a sense of dignity and a sense of what is right.

That was Bob Beverly, as a senator and person.

He recalled that on the death of George Gershwin, it was said by a friend, “I don’t have to believe it if I do not want to.”  And with great poignancy stated, “Bob Beverly died on October 14th 2009 and I don’t have to believe it if I don’t want to.”

Beverly’s young Grandson, Angus, recalled conversations with his grandfather, doing word scrambles and the senator’s love of American history.  How his grandfather taught him confidence and integrity. 

He said he loved these conversations with his grandfather.  Like the time Bob was discussing oil drilling and the effects on the environment with his daughter, Angus’ mother. 

Angus joined the conversation, agreeing with his mother’s point of view and told his Republican grandfather, “Everyone knows Republicans do not care about the environment.”

The senator paused, and then reminded his grandson, “Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican and he cared about the environment. Don’t tell me Republicans do not care about the environment.”

He remembered the time they visited Washington D.C.  How “they visited the various monuments and the conversations they had about them or the people they celebrated.

But one was especially important one, the World War II Memorial, where for the first time, he saw his grandfather cry.

“He was silent as his eyes teared up. I know it was for the people in that war that he cared about,” Angus said.

One of Beverly’s sons thanked the caregivers who gave their time to comfort his father during his last days.  He told us a story about election brochures and why Bob believed everything printed should get out before Election Day “because there is nothing more useless than an election brochure the day after an election.”

It was a ceremony that truly reflected the impact of legislative term limits, since it was void of any active members of the Senate.  Bob served 30 years in the Legislature, was vice chairman of the Rules Committee and routinely the upper house’s presiding officer, yet no current Senators were present. 

Greg Schmidt and I were asked by a former member of the Assembly, “Where is the Senate?” to which Greg Schmidt replied, “I guess it’s us”. 

In a different time, a quorum would have been present.

Our Secretary of the Senate said it so well: “Bob loved two things, life and the Senate. Life has subdivisions that were his privately: his family, his friends, his hometown, his history. But his love of the Senate was ours together.” 

Beverly believed fervently in the value of our governmental system, where citizens might be elected and serve with others who become friends, joining together to make this state a better place.

“He was the last Republican senator to preside—not that the rules have changed, not because he was subservient to the majority, but because he believed it was HIS goddamn house.

“He was there and he made his own way.”

It was a ceremony befitting the gentlemen he was.

-30-

 

Think of How Crowded the Freeways Will Be

Within 25 years, California’s population will reach 50 million, according to estimates by the state Department of Finance. 

By 2050, 60 million. 

The state’s roads, highways, schools and other public works are designed to serve 25 million — about 14 million fewer people than already live in California. 

To accommodate this projected population growth requires 220,000 new homes to be built each year, 19 new classrooms added every day for five years, delivery of an additional 200,000 acre-feet of water to the Central Valley and Southern California and construction of enough highways to handle 42 percent more vehicles. 

(From The State of California Debt Affordability Report, October 2009)

-30-

Rising Debt Payments Increase Budget Pressures

Among the points made in State Treasurer Bill Lockyer’s wide-ranging testimony to the Senate and Assembly Select Committees on Improving State Government (See the post below) is that California can no longer keep issuing debt willy-nilly.

He explicates the point in his recently issued annual Debt Affordability Report which shows the amount of debt service the cash-starved General Fund pays doubling from $6 billion this year to more than $12 billion in seven years.

That $12 billion in the 2016-2017 state fiscal year represents nearly 10.5 percent of the General Fund, up from 6.7 percent his year.

Lockyer recommends creating a commission, which, in turn would create a master plan on long-term investment in public works, which currently are inadequate for a state of 39 million residents, let alone the 50 million residents California is expected to have within 25 years.

“Rising debt service costs during the next three budget cycles will crimp the availability of General Fund monies to pay for state services,” the report says.

“The problem will not begin to recede until the state’s revenue flow begins to recover from the recession. Even then, (the treasurer’s office) estimates debt service costs will be at historically high levels through the coming decade and beyond.”

Worse, most of that higher level of debt service stems from already issued bonds so “balancing the budget will have to be accomplished with little help from the debt service side of the ledger.”

Using Department of Finance revenue estimates created in July, the report notes that as debt service payments increase, so does the recurring gap between state revenues and spending commitments.

In the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 the Schwarzenegger administration estimates there will be a budget gap of $7.4 billion. The following year there will be one of $15.5 billion and $15.1 billion the year after that.

And since those estimates were made in July it is likely the imbalances have worsened. For example, in July 2009 unemployment was 11.9 percent statewide. It climbed to 12.3 percent in August and dropped slightly to 12.2 percent in September.

What were previously the fastest growing parts of the state – Riverside and San Bernardino have unemployment rates of 14.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively. Los Angeles County has a 12.7 percent rate.

Among the report’s other grim news, California’s current bond ratings are the lowest of any state. “Significantly lower,” as the report says. Low bond ratings translate into higher borrowing costs.
A continuing concern of Moody’s Fitch and Standard & Poor’s, the bond rating agencies, is that the majority of state revenues – in particular personal income tax – are sharply affected by the boom-bust of economic cycles.

“The state’s dependence on income taxes, including the capital gains tax and sales taxes increases budget pressures during periods of economic weakness – especially if spending is not properly managed during boom times. In addition, the state’s use of one-time budget solutions continues to concern the rating agencies,” the report says.

One-time solutions like the ones that will likely be used by lawmakers and Schwarzenegger as they grapple with next year’s budget shortfall.

-30-

Effective Approach to a Common Problem

“I never panic when I get lost, I just change where I want to go.”

                                                                               –Rita Rudner

Why Isn’t This Man California’s Next Governor?

When he gets up a decent head of rhetoric steam, State Treasurer Bill Lockyer is remarkable to behold.

On October 22, in approximately 15 minutes of testimony before the Senate and Assembly select committees on Improving State Government, the former Attorney General and Senate president pro tempore said he was “Aristotelian” a “First Amendment purist,” informed the committee that “politics is theater for ugly people” and two-thirds of the bills passed by the Assembly are “junk.”

The select committees are considering ways to improve the legislative process. The San Leandro Democrat was to be part of a panel focused on “Pressing Issues, Bipartisanship, Oversight and Strengthening Integrity of the Legislative Process.”

However, Mike Feuer, a Los Angeles Democrat who chairs the Assembly committee, said Lockyer’s schedule didn’t allow and so he would speak on his own.

The committee had trouble stopping him.

A key part of the problem with the government, Lockyer said, is that it is designed not to work.

“Three branches, two houses, checks and balances. Nothing will happen and people will be left alone,” he said, in paraphrasing the thinking of the Founding Fathers.

Shortly after they arrive, legislators should meet with committee staff to educate themselves on policy, Lockyer said.

Legislative oversight?

“We all talk about it but it rarely happens.”

On the differences between the executive branch and the Legislature:

“You’re paid for results, not having an opinion.”

Legislators ought to “look at something.” If carrying a bill about the Employment Development Department, a lawmaker should visit the department and talk to long-time employees. Not the director of the department, Lockyer said, because they’ll “just whine about their budget.”

In wanting to gather such empirical information, Lockyer said he was “very Aristotelian.”

Sen. Mark Wyland, an Escondido Republican, said sitting legislators simply didn’t have enough time to go and personally visit the entities their policy affects.

“You got to make it,” Lockyer said.

Lockyer admitted to having difficulty embracing limits on the amount of legislation that can be introduced because he said he is a “First Amendment purist.”

However, perhaps “graduated” bill limits would be sensible, Lockyer allowed.

“Don’t let the first termers introduce more than five bills,” Lockyer said facetiously. The committee, at least, appeared to believe he was joking.

He urged lawmakers to stop passing “junk,” telling them “Nancy Reagan’s right: Just say “no.’ “

To Democrats, Lockyer said, “In an era where we’re not going to have tax increases, give it up.”

When putting together a budget “truncate the subcommittees that don’t do anything except rubber-stamp the special interests that come before them.”

That, Lockyer said, would “get the real work started sooner.”

He urged that policy committees be more active in crafting trailer bills accompanying the budget because it’s “not fair to have people work hard in policy committee and then have it changed at the last minute.” 

Feuer asked how Lockyer specifically would reduce the volume of legislation by, say, 30 percent to 40 percent.

Allowing as to the difficulty of doing so, Lockyer said:

 “Bills are my babies. I love every one of them. I don’t want them aborted or anything else.”

Realizing what he just said: “Sorry to get in the middle of another philosophical dispute.”

He described Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s $15 billion of Economic Recovery Bonds as a “bad idea” because the state is using long-term bonds to pay current bills.

“Please don’t do it anymore,” Lockyer said, before stressing how delays in enacting budgets drive up the state’s borrowing costs.

Lockyer volunteered that “it’s impossible for the Legislature to reform the pension system and, if we don’t, it bankrupts the state.”

The reason?

Lockyer didn’t say specifically but attributed it to who elected the lawmakers, which, at least for Democrats, are largely campaign contributions from public employee unions.

In response to a question about the negative impact of term limits, Lockyer suggested replacing the current process of electing legislators with picking 120 people by lottery and giving them eight year terms after which they would be forever banished from state elected office.

How can lawmakers reform the process? Lockyer was asked.

“You can pass almost anything if you add sufficient punishment for the Legislature.”

Lockyer noted that his favorite place to visit is not the state Capitol. 

“I try and stay out of this building. It feels so irrational when I come over here.”

And, as to why California continues to be plagued by a spate of problems:

“Big problems don’t get solved because they’re kind of unsolvable.”

Bruised legislative egos were the only reported injuries.

Prior to Lockyer’s testimony, Feuer asked another speaker in the midst of detailing his views on government reform to wrap up, in the interest of time. 

The hearing on reform began 15 minutes after its scheduled start.

Catch Lockyer’s performance on the re-run of the Joint Legislative Hearing on Legislative Reform on the California Channel.


-30-

 

There Doesn’t Appear to Be Any Let-up Whatsoever

Although the state Legislature is in recess until the beginning of January the quest for campaign contributions certainly isn’t.

Candidates seeking election to the Legislature and lawmakers seeking re-election or higher office have 22 fundraisers scheduled – so far – from October 27 through December 11.

That does not count two Nevada lawmakers — Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera and Assembly member Lynn Stewart – who are holding a $1,000-a-head event and $500-a-person event, respectively.

The most costly event is $7,500 to travel to the Bandon Dunes golf resort in Oregon December 9, play a couple rounds with Sen. Ron Calderon, a Montebello Democrat, and return December 11.  

-30-

Two GOP Senators Square Off Against Each Other

There’s some friction in the state Senate Republican caucus because two of its members are running for statewide office – against each other.

Sen. Sam Aanestad of Grass Valley faces Sen. Jeff Denham of Merced in the 2010 lieutenant governor primary.

Aanestad recently launched his campaign. Denham’s view is that in instances where two senators are running against each other, one should not be “favored” as he believes Aanestad is with a seat on the upper house’s powerful Rules Committee.

So Denham penned a letter seeking support from his fellow Republicans for Aanestad resigning from the committee, a move, not surprisingly, Aanestad opposes. 

In a recent meeting of the GOP caucus, Denham sought action on his request. Senate Republican Leader Dennis Hollingsworth of Murrieta said he wanted to deal with the issue later, sources say.

Denham sought a vote to, in essence, override Hollingsworth and take up the Aanestad issue. The caucus voted 9 to 4 take the issue up, with Hollingsworth and Aanestad representing half of the “no” votes.

Then, again over the Republican leader’s objection, a vote was taken on whether Aanestad should resign from the committee. The vote was 9 to 4 in favor of Aanestad’s resignation. Despite the vote, he declined.

Nor does he need to resign, other than to avoid the ire of nine of his fellow Senate Republicans.

The four members of the Rules Committee, other than the Senate President Pro Tempore who is the chair, are elected to their posts by a vote of the full upper house.

Once a member of the Rules Committee the only way to leave it is to resign or no longer be a senator.

If a vacancy were to occur during the Legislature’s current recess, which seems unlikely given Aanestad’s reaction to the caucus vote, the remaining four Rules members choose a fifth member. When in session, election is by the whole Senate.

-30-